4.7 Article

A conditional random field based feature learning framework for battery capacity prediction

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17455-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJQN202001142]
  2. Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology [cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0352]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M700616]
  4. Chongqing University of Technology [2019ZD118]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a network model framework based on LSTM and CRF to improve the accuracy of Li-ion battery capacity prediction. Through experiments and tests on different temporal feature extraction modules, the study shows that the proposed model can achieve better prediction results.
This paper proposes a network model framework based on long and short-term memory (LSTM) and conditional random field (CRF) to promote Li-ion battery capacity prediction results. The model uses LSTM to extract temporal features from the data and CRF to build a transfer matrix to enhance temporal feature learning for long serialization prediction of lithium battery feature sequence data. The NASA PCOE lithium battery dataset is selected for the experiments, and control tests on LSTM temporal feature extraction modules, including recurrent neural network (RNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), bi-directional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU) and bi-directional long and short term memory (BiLSTM) networks, are designed to test the adaptability of the CRF method to different temporal feature extraction modules. Compared with previous Li-ion battery capacity prediction methods, the network model framework proposed in this paper achieves better prediction results in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available