4.7 Article

Prediction Tool to Estimate Potassium Diet in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Developed Using a Machine Learning Tool: The UniverSel Study

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14122419

Keywords

potassium diet; prediction tool; Bayesian network; chronic kidney disease; Epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop a reliable method to estimate dietary potassium intake in CKD patients in order to improve prevention of cardiovascular complications. A clinical tool was developed using 24-hour urinary potassium excretion as a surrogate of dietary potassium intake. The prediction tool showed an accuracy of 74% in classifying potassium diet.
There is a need for a reliable and validated method to estimate dietary potassium intake in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to improve prevention of cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to develop a clinical tool to estimate potassium intake using 24-h urinary potassium excretion as a surrogate of dietary potassium intake in this high-risk population. Data of 375 adult CKD-patients routinely collecting their 24-h urine were included to develop a prediction tool to estimate potassium diet. The prediction tool was built from a random sample of 80% of patients and validated on the remaining 20%. The accuracy of the prediction tool to classify potassium diet in the three classes of potassium excretion was 74%. Surprisingly, the variables related to potassium consumption were more related to clinical characteristics and renal pathology than to the potassium content of the ingested food. Artificial intelligence allowed to develop an easy-to-use tool for estimating patients' diets in clinical practice. After external validation, this tool could be extended to all CKD-patients for a better clinical and therapeutic management for the prevention of cardiovascular complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available