4.3 Review

Technology-assisted balance assessment and rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 213-230

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220060

Keywords

Spinal cord injury; balance rehabilitation; balance assessment; rehabilitation technologies

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health
  2. [GR-2019-12369207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review explored the technology-assisted strategies to assess and rehabilitate balance function in persons with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). The findings suggest that while technology-assisted rehabilitation has positive effects on balance, the improvements are not greater than those achieved through other rehabilitation therapies. The heterogeneity, low methodological quality, and limited number of studies included in the review prevent reaching general conclusions about the usefulness of technology-assisted balance assessment and training in individuals with SCI, despite some studies reporting significant improvements.
BACKGROUND: Balance is a crucial function of basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and is often considered the priority in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) patients' rehabilitation. Technological devices have been developed to support balance assessment and training, ensuring an earlier, intensive, and goal-oriented motor therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to explore the technology-assisted strategies to assess and rehabilitate balance function in persons with SCI. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Full reports on Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) of parallel-group or cross-over design and non-RCTs were included according to the following criteria: i) publication year from 1990 to 2021; ii) balance considered as a primary or secondary outcome; iii) population of individuals with SCI with age over 18 years old, regardless of traumatic or non-traumatic lesions, Time Since Injury, lesion level, Asia Impairment Scale score and gender. The methodological quality was determined for each included study according to the recognized Downs and Black (D&B) tool. RESULTS: Nineteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Four articles focused on balance assessment while 15 targeted rehabilitation interventions to improve balance by using Treadmill-Based Devices (TBD), OverGround Devices (OGD) and Tilt Table Devices (TTD). Statistically significant effects on balance can be found in TBD subcategory, in the hip-knee guidance subcategory of OGD and in the study of TTD category. CONCLUSION: Although different studies reported positive effects, improvements due to technology-assisted rehabilitation were not greater than those obtained by means of other rehabilitation therapies. The heterogeneity, low methodological quality, and the small number of the studies included do not allow general conclusions about the usefulness of technology-assisted balance assessment and training in individuals with SCI, even if significant improvements have been reported in some studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available