4.6 Article

Effects of Relative Positions of Defect to Inclusion on Nanocomposite Strength

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15144906

Keywords

nanocomposite; crack; mechanical strength; finite element simulation; epoxy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that stress concentrations around inherent defects in materials can sometimes be reduced by adding nanoparticles to improve material strength. However, experiments coating nanoinclusions with a layer of rubbery material aiming for higher energy absorption did not computationally achieve the expected strength enhancement.
It is generally accepted that material inhomogeneity causes stress concentrations at the interface and thus reduces the overall strength of a composite. To overcome this reduction in strength, some groups experimented on coating the nanoinclusions with a layer of rubbery material, aiming for higher energy absorption. However, representative volume element (RVE) nanocomposite models, established with randomly distributed core-shell nanoparticles and single nanoparticle cells, show that the enhancement in strength observed in some experiments remains elusive computationally. By including a pre-existing crack in the matrix of the RVE, the stress concentration at the crack tip is reduced for cases where the nanoparticle and precrack are aligned away from the loading direction. This suggests that stress concentrations around inherent defects in materials can sometimes be reduced by adding nanoparticles to improve material strength. The effect is reversed if the crack and nanoparticle are aligned towards the loading direction. Parametric studies were also carried out in terms of the relative stiffness of the nanoparticle to the matrix and crack length. Validation tests were performed on 3D RVEs with an elliptical crack as the initial defect, and the results match with the 2D findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available