4.6 Article

Structure Characterization and Impact Effect of Al-Cu Graded Materials Prepared by Tape Casting

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15144834

Keywords

Al-Cu composite; graded materials; interface reflection principle; acoustic impedance; gas gun experiment

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFB3802300]
  2. KeyArea Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2021B0707050001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51932006, 11772312, 11802285]
  4. openly introduced scientific research team [HJL202202A007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the response of materials under high-pressure compression is achieved by launching graded materials using a gas gun. The impact behavior of the materials is explained through analysis of microstructure and acoustic impedance.
With the need of developing new materials, exploring new phenomenon, and discovering new mechanisms under extreme conditions, the response of materials to high-pressure compression attract more attention. However, the high-pressure state deviating from the Hugoniot line is difficult to realize by conventional experiments. Gas gun launching graded materials could reach the state. In our work, the corresponding Al-Cu composites and graded materials are prepared by tape casting and hot-pressing sintering. The microstructure and the acoustic impedance of the corresponding Al-Cu composites are analyzed to explain the impact behavior of Al-Cu graded materials. Computed tomographic testing and three-dimension surface profilometry machine results demonstrated well-graded structure and parallelism of the graded material. Al-Cu GMs with good parallelism are used to impact the Al-LiF target at 2.3 km/s using a two-stage light-gas gun, with an initial shock impact of 20.6 GPa and ramping until 27.2 GPa, deviating from the Hugoniot line.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available