4.5 Article

Antenatal screening timeline and cutoff scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for predicting postpartum depressive symptoms in healthy women: a prospective cohort study

Journal

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04740-w

Keywords

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; Postpartum depression; Postpartum depressive symptoms; Screening; Cutoff; Prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the optimal time and cutoff score for antenatal screening for prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and to identify risk factors for PDS. The study found that an EPDS score of 4/5 during the second trimester may be suitable for initial screening for PDS, and women with an EPDS score >= 5 at the second trimester require more elaborate follow-up. Additionally, an EPDS score >= 5 during the second trimester and a family history of mental illness were significantly associated with PDS.
Background It is worthwhile to identify women at risk of developing postpartum depression during pregnancy. This study aimed to determine the optimal time and cutoff score for antenatal screening for prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and to identify risk factors for PDS. Methods The target population was healthy pregnant women receiving antenatal care at a university hospital in Tokyo, Japan. During the first, second, and third trimesters, 3-4 days postpartum, and one month postpartum, they were asked to take the Japanese version of the EPDS questionnaire. The primary outcome of the study was PDS, defined as an EPDS score >= 9 at one month postpartum. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EPDS scores at each antenatal screening time were calculated. Results From 139 pregnant women, 129 were successfully followed up throughout the study. The number of women with an EPDS score >= 9 during the first, second, and third trimesters, 3-4 days postpartum, and one month postpartum were 6/126 (4.8%), 9/124 (7.3%), 5/117 (4.3%), 17/123 (13.8%), and 15/123 (12.2%), respectively. Screening during the second trimester had the highest AUC to predict PDS (0.89) among antenatal screenings. The optimal EPDS cutoff score during the second trimester was 4/5 (sensitivity: 85.7%; specificity: 77.1%; PPV: 33.3%; NPV: 97.6%). An EPDS score >= 5 during the second trimester (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 15.9; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.2-78.1) and a family history of mental illness (aOR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.2-17.5) were significantly associated with PDS. Conclusions Our study suggests that the EPDS score at the second trimester with the cutoff value of 4/5 may be adequate for initial screening for prediction of PDS. Women with an EPDS score >= 5 at the second trimester require more elaborate follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available