4.4 Article

Multicenter Pivotal Study Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy of a New Cellulite Procedure: 3-Month Results

Journal

AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 97-108

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac179

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated that targeted verifiable subcision (TVS) is a safe and feasible method for reducing the appearance of moderate to severe cellulite in adult women.
Background: Cellulite is an aesthetic condition affecting the appearance of skin in certain body regions and is associated with body dissatisfaction, psychosocial stress, and decreased quality of life. Previous studies established the safety and feasibility of a novel, minimally invasive device to identify and release septa responsible for cellulite depressions: targeted verifiable subcision (TVS). Objectives: The objective of this single-arm, open-label, multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TVS for reducing the appearance of moderate to severe cellulite in adult women. Methods: Adult women aged 21 to 55 years and a BMI < 30 kg/m(2) with moderate or severe cellulite on the buttocks and/or thighs were eligible to enroll at 9 sites. Endpoint data included results from 4 of the postprocedural follow-up visits at 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days. The primary endpoints were a mean >= 1 point reduction in the Cellulite Severity Scale at 90 days and no related serious adverse events at 30 days. Results: Seventy-four female participants with a mean BMI of 24.8 +/- 2.7 and age of 41.4 +/- 7.4 years received this single procedure. The mean improvement in Cellulite Severity Scale (N = 68) was 1.5 +/- 0.9 (P < 0.0001). There were no device-related serious adverse events at 30 days. Conclusions: TVS for selectively identifying and verifiably releasing septa responsible for cellulite depressions is an effective and safe means to improve the appearance of moderate to severe cellulite in adult women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available