4.8 Article

Neurotoxic amyloidogenic peptides in the proteome of SARS-COV2: potential implications for neurological symptoms in COVID-19

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30932-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences (LIMS)
  2. CASS foundation [10053]
  3. Fonds Nationale de la Recherche, Luxembourg [C20/MS/14588607]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors report the presence of toxic clumps of protein in the COVID-19 virus that resemble amyloid assemblies found in Alzheimer's disease. They suggest that these clumps may play a role in the neurological symptoms observed in long-COVID.
Here the authors report the formation of toxic clumps of protein, similar to amyloid assemblies found in Alzheimer's disease and suggest their possible role for some of the neurological symptoms of long-COVID. COVID-19 is primarily known as a respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. However, neurological symptoms such as memory loss, sensory confusion, severe headaches, and even stroke are reported in up to 30% of cases and can persist even after the infection is over (long COVID). These neurological symptoms are thought to be produced by the virus infecting the central nervous system, however we don't understand the molecular mechanisms triggering them. The neurological effects of COVID-19 share similarities to neurodegenerative diseases in which the presence of cytotoxic aggregated amyloid protein or peptides is a common feature. Following the hypothesis that some neurological symptoms of COVID-19 may also follow an amyloid etiology we identified two peptides from the SARS-CoV-2 proteome that self-assemble into amyloid assemblies. Furthermore, these amyloids were shown to be highly toxic to neuronal cells. We suggest that cytotoxic aggregates of SARS-CoV-2 proteins may trigger neurological symptoms in COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available