4.4 Review

Review: Meta-analysis on mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents' stress, depression, and anxiety in school settings: a cautionary tale

Journal

CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 307-317

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/camh.12572

Keywords

Mindfulness; mindfulness-based interventions; adolescents; schools; students; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in school settings for adolescents with symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety. The results showed that MBIs had a significant improvement in reducing stress, but did not have a significant effect on depression and anxiety. The effects were significant when compared to inactive controls, but not when compared to active controls.
Background Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been applied in school settings for adolescents with symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety; however, general conclusions of the efficacy of such interventions remain unclear. This meta-analysis reviewed randomized-controlled MBI trials for stress, depression, and anxiety in school settings. Methods One hundred one records were included after removing duplicates. Nine studies met inclusion criteria, totalling 5046 adolescents aged 12-18. Eighteen comparisons between an MBI and a control group were analyzed. Results The overall effect for symptoms of the 17 observations including stress, depression, and anxiety resulted in a significant improvement with a small effect size (k = 17, n = 3721, Hedge's g = .33, CI 95% .17-.49 p < .01). Subgroup analysis revealed that when MBIs were compared to an active control group effects were not significant (k = 5, n = 2753, Hedge's g = .27, CI 95% -.03-.57 p = .08), and when compared to an inactive control group the effect was significant with a small effect size (k = 5, n = 1065, Hedge's g = .38, CI 95% .02-.75 p < .05). Analysis of the interventions on a per symptom basis yielded a significant and moderate effect size for perceived stress (k = 7, n = 1116, Hedge's g = .55, CI 95% .31-.79 p < .01); however, there were no significant effects for depression (k = 6, n = 3172, Hedge's g = .20, CI 95% -.05-.44 p < .01) and anxiety (k = 4, n = 837, Hedge's g = .19, CI 95% -.14-.53 p = .25). Conclusions The impact of MBIs in school settings for adolescents yielded a significant improvement for stress, but did not for depression and anxiety. The effects were significant when compared to inactive controls, but not when compared to active controls. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available