Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis
Inci Kizildag Yirgin et al.
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT (2022)
Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence
Kristina Lang et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2021)
Artificial Intelligence in Screening Mammography: A Population Survey of Women's Preferences
Yfke P. Ongena et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY (2021)
Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach
William Lotter et al.
NATURE MEDICINE (2021)
An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude
Merel Huisman et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2021)
Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study
Suzanne L. van Winkel et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2021)
Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy
Karoline Freeman et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
Scott Mayer McKinney et al.
NATURE (2020)
Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk
M. Le Boulc'h et al.
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING (2020)
Improving Breast Cancer Detection Accuracy of Mammography with the Concurrent Use of an Artificial Intelligence Tool
Serena Pacile et al.
RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (2020)
Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms
Thomas Schaffter et al.
JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2020)
Variability in Individual Radiologist BI-RADS 3 Usage at a Large Academic Center: What's the Cause and What Should We Do About It?
Emily B. Ambinder et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2019)
Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System
Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz et al.
RADIOLOGY (2019)
French program of breast cancer screening: Radiologist viewpoint
Luc Ceugnart et al.
BULLETIN DU CANCER (2019)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the early detection of breast cancer: a scoping review to assess AI's potential in breast screening practice
Nehmat Houssami et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES (2019)
Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography
Alyssa T. Watanabe et al.
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING (2019)
Breast cancer: News tools in imaging
Luc Ceugnart et al.
PRESSE MEDICALE (2019)
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Imaging: Cost-Benefit Analysis
Ray C. Mayo et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2019)
Improving Accuracy and Efficiency with Concurrent Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Emily F. Conant et al.
RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (2019)
Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions
Thijs Kooi et al.
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS (2017)
EARLY DETECTION AND SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER
Cathy Coleman
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING (2017)
Interobserver variability in upgraded and non-upgraded BI-RADS 3 lesions
A. Y. Michaels et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2017)
Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnotic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists
Amie Y. Lee et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2017)
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
Constance D. Lehman et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)
Variability and errors when applying the BIRADS mammography classification
Bruno Boyer et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2013)
Power Estimation for Multireader ROC Methods: An Updated and Unified Approach
Stephen L. Hillis et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2011)
The Laboratory effect: Comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations
David Gur et al.
RADIOLOGY (2008)
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography
Joshua J. Fenton et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2007)
Screening for breast cancer with mammography
P. C. Gotzsche et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2006)
Share Paper
