4.5 Article

Handling irregularly sampled signals with gated temporal convolutional networks

Journal

SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 817-823

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-022-02292-2

Keywords

Sequential learning; Irregular sampling; Temporal convolutional networks; Time series classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the problem of sequential modeling and introduces a novel gating mechanism into the architecture of temporal convolutional networks. The proposed gated temporal convolutional network is designed to address the issues of gradient flow, vanishing or exploding gradient, and dead ReLU. Furthermore, it is capable of modeling irregularly sampled sequences. Experimental results demonstrate that the basic gated temporal convolutional network outperforms generic architectures in tasks involving long-term dependencies and irregular sampling intervals. Additionally, state-of-the-art results are achieved on the permuted sequential MNIST and sequential CIFAR10 benchmarks using the basic structure.
We investigate the sequential modeling problem and introduce a novel gating mechanism into the temporal convolutional network architectures. In particular, we introduce the gated temporal convolutional network architecture with elaborately tailored gating mechanisms. In our implementation, we alter the way in which the gradients flow and avoid the vanishing or exploding gradient and the dead ReLU problems. The proposed GTCN architecture is able to model the irregularly sampled sequences as well. In our experiments, we show that the basic GTCN architecture is superior to the generic TCN architectures in various benchmark tasks requiring the modeling of long-term dependencies and irregular sampling intervals. Moreover, we achieve the state-of-the-art results on the permuted sequential MNIST and the sequential CIFAR10 benchmarks with the basic structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available