4.6 Article

Omicron BA.1 Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Lead to Reduced T-Cell Response in Vaccinated and Convalescent Individuals

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14071570

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Omicron BA.1 variant; mutations; T-cell response; vaccination; natural infection; cross-reactivity; immune escape; CD4(+) T-cell epitopes; HLA motif prediction

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Omicron BA.1 variant can evade neutralizing antibodies but does not significantly impact T-cell reactivity. However, it does result in the loss of cross-reactivity of memory T cells to immunodominant epitopes of the spike protein.
Omicron BA.1 variant can readily infect people with vaccine-induced or naturally acquired SARS-CoV-2 immunity facilitated by escape from neutralizing antibodies. In contrast, T-cell reactivity against the Omicron BA.1 variant seems relatively well preserved. Here, we studied the preexisting T cells elicited by either vaccination with the mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine or by natural infection with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 for their cross-reactive potential to 20 selected CD4(+) T-cell epitopes of spike-protein-harboring Omicron BA.1 mutations. Although the overall memory CD4(+) T-cell responses primed by the ancestral spike protein was still preserved generally, we show here that there is also a clear loss of memory CD4(+) T-cell cross-reactivity to immunodominant epitopes across the spike protein due to Omicron BA.1 mutations. Complete or partial loss of preexisting T-cell responsiveness was observed against 60% of 20 nonconserved CD4(+) T-cell epitopes predicted to be presented by a broad set of common HLA class II alleles. Monitoring such mutations in circulating strains helps predict which virus variants may escape previously induced cellular immunity and could be of concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available