4.1 Article

Investigation of Foreign Particles in Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine

Journal

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/yakushi.22-00067

Keywords

Coronavirus Disease 2019 vaccine; foreign particle; visible inspection; particulate matter test; digital microscope; energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foreign particles were found in Moderna vaccine vials at a vaccination site in Japan, leading to a recall of the affected batches. Analysis indicated that the particles were stainless steel SUS 316L, which had already been administered to some individuals. Further examination with a digital microscope revealed smaller particles, suggesting more vials may have been affected.
Particular batches of Moderna mRNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine were recalled after foreign particles were found in some vaccine vials at the vaccination site in Japan in August 2021. We investigated the foreign particles at the request of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis suggested that the foreign particles found in the vials recalled from the vaccination sites were from stainless steel SUS 316L, which was in line with the findings of the root cause investigation by the manufacturer. The sizes of the observed particles ranged from < 50 mu m to 548 mu m in the major axis. Similar foreign particles were also detected in 2 of the 5 vaccine vials of the same lot stored by the manufacturer, indicating that the foreign particles have already been administered to some people via vaccine. Observation of the vials of the same lot by digital microscope found smaller particles those were not detected by visual inspection, suggesting that more vials were affected. Contrarily, visual inspection and subvisible particulate matter test indicated no foreign particles in the vials of normal lots. Possible root cause and strategies to prevent such a deviation were discussed from technical and regulatory aspects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available