4.7 Article

Tribological behaviour of different formulations of WC composites

Journal

WEAR
Volume 506, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204415

Keywords

Cemented carbides; Reciprocating sliding; Wear; Dry contact; Friction

Funding

  1. FCT [SFRH/BD/138040/2018]
  2. FCT/MEC (PIDDAC) [UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020, LA/P/0006/2020]
  3. FEDER under PT2020 Partnership Agreement [HARDTECH-POCI-01-0247-FEDER-045283]
  4. FCT -Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UIDB/00285/2020, LA/P/0112/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

WC-based composites are widely used in mechanical applications due to their excellent wear and corrosion resistance. However, the use of cobalt as a binder poses supply risk and economic concerns. This study focuses on developing new cemented carbide grades to substitute cobalt binder and investigates their mechanical and tribological properties through wear tests and scratch tests.
WC-based composites are extremely resistant to wear and corrosion; they are used in numerous mechanical applications (e.g., pumps, valves, mechanical seals, flow control technology, etc.). They are generally produced by sintering tungsten carbide with a metal binder (cobalt is the most common). However, Co is part of the 2017 list of 27 critical raw materials with a high supply-risk and economic importance to which reliable and unhindered access is a concern for European industry and value chains. This paper aims at the mechanical and tribological characterization, by reciprocating sliding wear experiments and scratch tests, of new and innovative cemented carbide grades that contribute to the reduction/substitution of critical materials like the Co binder. It was found that Co plays an important role in the wear behaviour of hardmetals. On the other hand, the composites developed present wear rates close (although higher) to WC-Co, constituting valid alternatives for wear parts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available