4.8 Article

Accelerating hydrodynamic simulations of urban drainage systems with physics-guided machine learning

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118972

Keywords

Hydrodynamic simulation; Scientific machine learning; Surrogate model; Urban drainage

Funding

  1. Danish Environmental Agency (Miljostyrelsen) under the MUDP programme through the Clacos project [2020-15748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a physics-guided machine learning approach for fast and accurate surrogate modelling of urban drainage system hydraulics. It significantly reduces simulation times compared to traditional HiFi models while preserving a high level of model detail.
We propose and demonstrate a new approach for fast and accurate surrogate modelling of urban drainage system hydraulics based on physics-guided machine learning. The surrogates are trained against a limited set of simulation results from a hydrodynamic (HiFi) model. Our approach reduces simulation times by one to two orders of magnitude compared to a HiFi model. It is thus slower than e.g. conceptual hydrological models, but it enables simulations of water levels, flows and surcharges in all nodes and links of a drainage network and thus largely preserves the level of detail provided by HiFi models. Comparing time series simulated by the surrogate and the HiFi model, R-2 values in the order of 0.9 are achieved. Surrogate training times are currently in the order of one hour. However, they can likely be reduced through the application of transfer learning and graph neural networks. Our surrogate approach will be useful for interactive workshops in initial design phases of urban drainage systems, as well as for real time applications. In addition, our model formulation is generic and future research should investigate its application for simulating other water systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available