4.6 Article

Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Nitrate Contamination Using an Improved Model in the Regueb Basin, Central Tunisia

Journal

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Volume 233, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-022-05806-3

Keywords

Nitrate; Groundwater; Vulnerability; GIS; Central Tunisia

Funding

  1. International Association of Water Resources in the Southern Mediterranean Basin, Tunisia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the groundwater quality in Regueb basin has been degraded due to excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides. This study used physicochemical elements and several factor types to assess the vulnerability of groundwater to pollution, which was validated with nitrate concentrations.
In recent years, Regueb basin has been facing groundwater quality degradation due to the excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides, which is the result of strong agricultural activities. Physicochemical elements (TDS, NO3-) and several factor types (geologic, hydrogeologic, and geomorphologic) were used in this study. The weighted model (TDLFSGC) was used to determine the groundwater vulnerability index (VI) to the pollution which is subsequently validated by Pearson correlation with nitrate concentrations. The results show that the TDS in groundwater ranged between 1.19 and 16.92 g/L and the NO3- concentrations varied from 150 to 920 mg/L. The vulnerability map generated using GIS shows three classes of VI in the study area, namely low (31.5-60), moderate (60-75), and high (75-13). The validation of the vulnerability model revealed a good correlation with NO3- and provided a high discretization of the groundwater vulnerability from anthropogenic pollution. This approach implies that more efforts should be taken to preserve the groundwater of the Regueb basin from contamination. And it could be used as a tool for water resource management in the future in similar regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available