4.2 Article

Evaluation of the practical clinical use of the Horse Grimace Scale translated into French

Journal

VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 615-623

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.07.003

Keywords

horse; Horse Grimace Scale; pain assessment; pain scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the reliability of a French version of the Horse Grimace Scale. The results showed that the scale can differentiate horses with visceral pain from those assumed to be pain-free, and there was high consistency among evaluators.
Objective To assess the reliability of a French version of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGSfv).Study design Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Animals The operated (OP) group included 13 horses un-dergoing elective surgery. The positive (PC) and negative control (NC) groups included seven colicking horses and eight exercising sport horses, respectively.Methods Photographs were extracted from videos of the horses' heads. Videos were taken before and immediately after surgery in OP, on arrival of the horse in PC, and at rest in their stalls in NC. Pictures were evaluated by three anaesthetists [Diplomates (DIPs)] and four riders (RIDs) using Horse Grimace Scale translated into French (HGSfv) at two points, 2 weeks apart (E1 and E2). Each evaluator gave each image a score (1-3) for six identified facial action units. The scores given by DIPs and RIDs were compared using a Wilcoxon test. Intra-and inter-evaluator reliability were assessed using Spearman correlation tests (rs) and intra-class coefficients (ICCs), respectively.Results RIDs and DIPs gave significantly higher scores in the PC group than in the NC group [RIDsE1PC 5.0 (4.2-9.8) versus RIDsE1NC 2.2 (0.0-6.5), p = 0.02; RID-sE2PC 5.2 (3.2-9.5) versus RIDsE2NC 2.0 (0.2-5.8), p < 0.01; DIPsE1PC 4.0 (1.3-6.3) versus DIPsE1NC 2.2 (1.0-4.7), p = 0.04; DIPsE2PC 2.7 (1.0-6.0) versus DIP-sE2NC 1.0 (0.0-2.3), p = 0.03]. Scores given by RID or DIPs 2 weeks apart were highly correlated [rs (RIDsE1, RIDsE2) r = 0.86, p < 0.0001] and [rs (DIPsE1, DIPsE2) r = 0.81 p < 0.0001]. The ICC between RIDs and DIPs in E1 and E2 was 0.94 (0.92-0.95) and 0.91 (0.89-0.93), respectively. The specificity and sensitivity of the HGSfv was 94% and 43%, respectively.Conclusions and clinical relevance Using the HGSfv, knowledge of horses rather than specialization in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia appears to differentiate horses with visceral pain from those assumed to be pain free.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available