4.6 Article

Influence mechanism of Au layer thickness on wettability of Sn-Ag-Cu solder on heated ENIG pads

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111074

Keywords

Electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG); Au layer; Wettability; Reflow; Intermetallic compounds

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005357]
  2. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province
  3. Yancheng Wearnes Electronics Co., LTD.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effect of Au layer thickness on the surface morphology, Ni distribution and wettability of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder on heated Cu pads with ENIG finish. It is found that Ni diffuses from the Ni layer to the Au surface, reacting with the ambience to form Ni oxides, which inhibit the interfacial reaction and result in barren zones. The size of the barren zones decreases with increasing Au layer thickness.
Solder wettability on substrate is an issue for the electronic devices. In this present, the heated Cu pads with ENIG finish was selected as the study object. Effect of Au layer thickness on ENIG surface morphology, Ni distribution and wettability of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder was investigated. An acceptable morphology with nanoscale fluctuation for ENIG surface was achieved, with the absence of interface cracking, pits, holes. Ni diffused from Ni layer to Au surface during heating process, then reacted with the ambience to form Ni oxides, the fraction was increased with the increasing Au layer thickness. The Ni oxides inhibited the interfacial reaction between Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu and Ni during reflow, and remained to the interface. It resulted in the formation of barren zones, where without any intermetallic compounds. With Au layer thickness increased, barren zones was shrunk until to disappear. The barren zones was responsible to the wettability of Sn solder. The more barren zones, the poor wettability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available