Journal
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127629
Keywords
Urban green spaces; COVID-19; Adaptive governance; Latin America
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examines adaptive governance in the management of urban green spaces in Latin America. The research finds that different governance arrangements have varying levels of adaptability in response to challenges. Polycentric and dedicated-management governances show greater flexibility through piloting ideas and adjusting decision-making processes. However, managers within municipal public services areas face difficulties in adapting due to limited autonomy, inadequate budgets, and a lack of technical knowledge.
Urban green spaces' well documented role as a hub for physical and mental health was enhanced by restrictions to mobility issued worldwide as a response to COVID-19. In this context, managers of urban green spaces (UGS) were prompted to provide controlled access under impromptu safety protocols. This unprecedented challenge required planning and operational strengths reflecting flexibility, innovation and learning. These management features are essential for an adaptive governance - an underdeveloped research topic within the study of UGS. Using eighteen semi-structured interviews from six countries, we analyze adaptive governance as reflected by UGS managers' responses across Latin America - a region where access to UGS is a matter of public health and of environmental justice. We document responses that can be categorized based on the governance arrangement in place. On one hand, both polycentric and dedicated-management governances have been able to learn through piloting ideas, adapting personnel roles and the function of UGS infrastructure, and adjusting their decisionmaking process. On the other hand, managers within municipal public services areas - the most prevalent governance arrangement across Latin America - report difficulty to adapt - likely due to their dependence on political will, limited autonomy, insufficient budgets, absence of formal paths to self-funding, shortage of technical know-how, and insufficient citizens' involvement. We discuss implications of UGS adaptive governance in terms of capacity to deal with future public health, climate-related or other types of shocks.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available