4.7 Review

State of the art of the methods proposed for selenium speciation analysis by CVG-AFS

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116617

Keywords

Selenium; Speciation; CVG-AFS; Microwave radiation; UV radiation

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [001]
  3. Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discusses the methods for selenium speciation analysis using CVG-AFS and their advantages and drawbacks.
The inorganic selenium speciation analysis by non-chromatographic methods using atomic fluorescence spectrometry with chemical vapor generation (CVG-AFS) involves the determination of total selenium and Se(IV). Quantification of Se(VI) concentration is obtained by the difference between the total selenium and Se(IV) concentrations. However, the determination of total selenium requires a pre-reduction step of Se(VI) to Se(IV), which is complicated because the kinetics of this reaction is very slow, although thermodynamically favorable. Even chromatographic speciation methods established with detection using CVG-AFS require a pre-reduction step from Se(VI) to Se(IV) because the chemical vapor generation occurs with the Se(IV) species converted to H2Se. This way, several strategies have been proposed for the selenium speciation involving microwave radiation, UV radiation, conventional heating, and different reagents (potassium iodide, sodium bromide, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, potassium bromate, organic acids), besides co-precipitation and solid-phase extraction procedures. This work reports the advantages and drawbacks of the main techniques employed in selenium speciation studies. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available