4.0 Article

IT/QA and Regulatory Aspects of Digital Pathology: Results of the 8th ESTP International Workshop

Journal

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 793-807

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01926233221113275

Keywords

digital pathology; GLP; regulatory; toxicologic pathology; information technology; validation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital toxicologic histopathology is widely used in preclinical compound development and there is increasing interest in implementing it for good laboratory practice-regulated study evaluations. However, implementation is not straightforward due to the need for qualification, validation, and security considerations. The European Society of Toxicologic Pathology organized an international expert workshop to discuss qualification and validation of digital histopathology systems in a good laboratory practice environment.
Digital toxicologic histopathology has been broadly adopted in preclinical compound development for informal consultation and peer review. There is now increased interest in implementing the technology for good laboratory practice-regulated study evaluations. However, the implementation is not straightforward because systems and work processes require qualification and validation, with consideration also given to security. As a result of the high-throughput, high-volume nature of safety evaluations, computer performance, ergonomics, efficiency, and integration with laboratory information management systems are further key considerations. The European Society of Toxicologic Pathology organized an international expert workshop with participation by toxicologic pathologists, quality assurance/regulatory experts, and information technology experts to discuss qualification and validation of digital histopathology systems in a good laboratory practice environment, and to share the resulting conclusions broadly in the toxicologic pathology community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available