4.4 Article

Daily sleep in relation to subjective and physiological stress in an occupational context: Daily vigour as a mediator

Journal

STRESS AND HEALTH
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 323-334

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/smi.3185

Keywords

blood pressure; cortisol decline; day-level relations; sleep; stress; vigour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies consistently show that stress has negative effects on sleep, but less attention has been given to the reverse relationship. This study examined the daily relationship between sleep quality and quantity, subjective and physiological stress in an occupational context. The results suggest that better sleep quality and longer sleep hours are related to increased vigour, which in turn lowers subjective stress.
Studies on the stress-sleep relationship consistently demonstrate negative effects of stress on sleep. The reversed relation, however, has received less research attention. Also, field studies on physiological stress are scarce. The aim of this day-level diary study was to examine daily relationships between sleep quality and quantity, and subjective and physiological stress in an occupational context. Moreover, we examined daily vigour as an underlying mechanism of the sleep-stress relationship. Participants were 167 knowledge workers who filled in daily questionnaires measuring sleep quality and quantity, morning vigour and subjective afternoon stress on Tuesdays and Thursdays for 5 weeks. Physiological stress was assessed with cortisol decline from morning peak to evening, and with blood pressure in the afternoon. Multilevel path analysis results showed that better sleep quality and longer sleep hours predicted increased vigour the following morning, which in turn predicted lower subjective stress in the afternoon. Sleep quality and quantity were not related to physiological stress neither directly nor indirectly via morning vigour. On the basis of our results, sleep should be considered as a factor affecting vigour which in turn seems to lower stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available