Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Model misspecification in stepped wedge trials: Random effects for time or treatment
Emily C. Voldal et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2022)
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview
Fan Li et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2021)
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Brantly Callaway et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS (2021)
Inference for the treatment effect in longitudinal cluster randomized trials when treatment effect heterogeneity is ignored
Rhys Bowden et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2021)
Robust inference for the stepped wedge design
James P. Hughes et al.
BIOMETRICS (2020)
Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials
Lee Kennedy-Shaffer et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2020)
Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials
J. Kasza et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2019)
Information content of cluster-period cells in stepped wedge trials
Jessica Kasza et al.
BIOMETRICS (2019)
Information content of stepped-wedge designs when treatment effect heterogeneity and/or implementation periods are present
Jessica Kasza et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment
Kelsey L. Grantham et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
A Community Health Worker Intervention to Increase Childhood Disease Treatment Coverage in Rural Liberia: A Controlled Before-and-After Evaluation
Emily E. White et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2018)
Robust analysis of stepped wedge trials using cluster-level summaries within periods
J. A. Thompson et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2018)
Mixed effects approach to the analysis of the stepped wedge cluster randomised trial-Investigating the confounding effect of time through simulation
Alecia Nickless et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
Cross-sectional stepped wedge designs always reduce the required sample size when there is no time effect
Xin Zhou et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Stepped wedge designs: insights from a design of experiments perspective
J. N. S. Matthews et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2017)
Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples
Karla Hemming et al.
TRIALS (2017)
Impact of disinvestment from weekend allied health services across acute medical and surgical wards: 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials
Terry P. Haines et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2017)
Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials
JoAnna M. Scott et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2017)
Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials
Richard Hooper et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2016)
Statistical efficiency and optimal design for stepped cluster studies under linear mixed effects models
Alan J. Girling et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2016)
Impacts on Breastfeeding Practices of At-Scale Strategies That Combine Intensive Interpersonal Counseling, Mass Media, and Community Mobilization: Results of Cluster-Randomized Program Evaluations in Bangladesh and Viet Nam
Purnima Menon et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2016)
Effect of the World Health Organization Checklist on Patient Outcomes A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Arvid Steinar Haugen et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2015)
Current issues in the design and analysis of stepped wedge trials
James P. Hughes et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2015)
Uptake and Population-Level Impact of Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: The Washington State Community-Level Randomized Trial of EPT
Matthew R. Golden et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2015)
Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs
Karla Hemming et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2015)
Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials are efficient and provide a method of evaluation without which some interventions would not be evaluated
Karla Hemming et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
The stepped wedge design does not inherently have more power than a cluster randomized controlled trial Reply
Daniel Kotz et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Researchers should convince policy makers to perform a classic cluster randomized controlled trial instead of a stepped wedge design when an intervention is rolled out
Daniel Kotz et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
There are some circumstances where the stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is preferable to the alternative: no randomized trial at all. Response to the commentary by Kotz and colleagues
Noreen D. Mdege et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Use of the stepped wedge design cannot be recommended: A critical appraisal and comparison with the classic cluster randomized controlled trial design
Daniel Kotz et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation
Noreen D. Mdege et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
A Bayesian approach to non-parametric monotone function estimation
Thomas S. Shively et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY (2009)
Learning curves in surgical practice
A. N. Hopper et al.
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL (2007)
Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials
Michael A. Hussey et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)
Share Paper
