4.5 Article

Estimating cumulative spatial risk over time with low-rank kriging multiple membership models

Journal

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 23, Pages 4593-4606

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9527

Keywords

Bayesian; bladder cancer; residential history; spatial cluster

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute [U01CA259376]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Health outcomes are influenced by various environmental factors. It is important to estimate cumulative spatial risk for diseases considering participants' multiple residential locations and other risk factors. In this study, a Bayesian model called LRK-MMM is proposed to estimate cumulative spatial risk at the point level, incorporating multiple membership model and low-rank kriging. The model shows improved spatial sensitivity and power to detect regions of elevated risk compared to existing methods. The model is applied to real case-control data to estimate cumulative spatial risk while adjusting for multiple covariates.
Many health outcomes result from accumulated exposures to one or more environmental factors. Accordingly, spatial risk studies have begun to consider multiple residential locations of participants, acknowledging that participants move and thus are exposed to environmental factors in several places. However, novel methods are needed to estimate cumulative spatial risk for disease while accounting for other risk factors. To this end, we propose a Bayesian model (LRK-MMM) that embeds a multiple membership model (MMM) into a low-rank kriging (LRK) model in order to estimate cumulative spatial risk at the point level while allowing for multiple residential locations per subject. The LRK approach offers a more computationally efficient means to analyze spatial risk in case-control study data at the point level compared with a Bayesian generalized additive model, and as increased precision in spatial risk estimates by analyzing point locations instead of administrative areas. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the efficacy of the model and its improvement upon an existing multiple membership model that uses area-level spatial random effects to estimate risk. The results show that our proposed method provides greater spatial sensitivity (improvements ranging from 0.12 to 0.54) and power (improvements ranging from 0.02 to 0.94) to detect regions of elevated risk for disease across a range of exposure scenarios. Finally, we apply our model to case-control data from the New England bladder cancer study to estimate cumulative spatial risk while adjusting for many covariates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available