4.3 Article

Starches Properties from Soft, Medium-Hard, and Hard Brazilian Wheat upon Annealing

Journal

STARCH-STARKE
Volume 74, Issue 9-10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.202100267

Keywords

gel texture; pasting properties; physical modification; Triticum aestivum L

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [432181/2018-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wheat kernel hardness affects the properties of starch, and annealing treatment has an impact on it. Starches from soft and hard wheat have higher amylose content, while medium-hard wheat starch has higher relative crystallinity. Annealing treatment increases the relative crystallinity of soft and hard wheat starch, and decreases pasting properties and swelling power.
Wheat kernel hardness is influenced by starch and protein association into the wheat grain. Therefore, starch properties may differ and result in different properties after physical modification. Starches isolated from hard, medium-hard, and soft Brazilian wheat are modified by annealing and evaluated by physicochemical, pasting and thermal properties, and crystallinity. Soft and hard wheat starches have the highest amylose content and are not influenced by annealing treatment. Relative crystallinity is higher in medium-hard wheat starch due to the lowest amylose content. However, it is not influenced by annealing treatment. In contrast, soft and hard wheat starches increase the relative crystallinity after annealing. Moreover, annealing reduces the pasting properties profile of all starches by decreasing viscosity (peak and final), breakdown, and setback; consequently, gel texture is also reduced. A decrease in swelling power is also noticed after annealing treatment. Wheat kernel hardness has influenced into properties of both native and annealed starches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available