4.2 Article

Separation of Aortic and Pulmonary Components from Second Heart Sounds without an Assumption of Statistical Independence

Journal

SENSORS AND MATERIALS
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 2723-2734

Publisher

MYU, SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING DIVISION
DOI: 10.18494/SAM3738

Keywords

heart sound; A2-P2 splitting interval; independent component analysis; nonlinear transient chirp signal model; demixing vector

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel algorithm that can separate aortic and pulmonary components from the second heart sound without assuming statistical independence is successfully demonstrated. The algorithm optimizes demixing vectors using root-mean-square error as the cost function. The results show that the proposed algorithm can estimate the splitting interval stably and with smaller error range compared to conventional methods.
A novel algorithm to separate aortic (A2) and pulmonary (P2) components from the second heart sound (S2) without assuming that A2 and P2 are statistically independent, and with optimizing demixing vectors using root-mean-square error (RMSE) between outputs and signal models as cost function is successfully demonstrated. Conventional methods to estimate the A2-P2 splitting interval (SI) based on the separation of A2 and P2 using independent component analysis (ICA) are subject to distortions due to the fact that A2 and P2 are not strictly statistically independent. Therefore, we propose an algorithm to separate A2 and P2 without assuming their independence. In the proposed algorithm, a nonlinear transient chirp signal model is introduced as the proper models of A2 and P2, and the separated sound is optimized to be closest to the A2/P2-like model. To evaluate the proposed algorithm, SI estimation was performed for S2 simulated with 60 common SI patterns. The results show that the proposed algorithm can estimate SI stably regardless of the independence of A2 and P2, and can estimate SI with 95% limits of agreement of -0.305 +/- 2.15 ms, which is about 69% smaller as the error range than ICA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available