4.4 Article

Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 44-51

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12311

Keywords

bile duct neoplasms; cytology; forceps biopsy; malignant biliary stricture; pancreatic cancer; transpapillary neoplasms

Funding

  1. Ministry of Culture and Science of Japan [26461046]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461046] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe diagnostic yields of endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsies for malignant biliary strictures (MBS) remain unclear and predictive factors for diagnosis have not been established. We aimed to clarify the diagnostic yields of both methods and the predictive factors MethodsWe reviewed 241 patients with biliary strictures who underwent transpapillary brush cytology (n=202) or forceps biopsy (n=208) between 2004 and 2014 at a single academic center. ResultsThe sensitivity of forceps biopsy for MBS was significantly higher than that of brush cytology [60.6% (97/160) vs 36.1% (57/158), P<0.01). The sensitivity of forceps biopsy was significantly higher in diagnosing bile duct cancer than pancreatic cancer [78.8% (52/66) vs 42.4% (28/66), P<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that serum total bilirubin (TB) level (T-Bil)4mg/dL [odds ratio (OR) 2.506, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.139-5.495, P=0.022) was an independent predictor for positive diagnosis by brush cytology, while bile duct cancer (OR 4.926, 95% CI 2.183-11.111, P<0.001), stricturelength 30mm (OR 2.941, 95% CI 1.119-7.752, P=0.029) and TB 4mg/dL (OR 2.252, 95% CI 1.052-4.831, P=0.037) were significant indicators of a positive diagnosis by forceps biopsy. ConclusionsEndoscopic transpapillary forceps biopsy shows higher sensitivity than that of brush cytology for MBS. Bile duct cancer, stricture length 30mm and TB 4mg/dL are good indicators of forceps biopsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available