4.6 Article

A New Proportionate Filtered-x RLS Algorithm for Active Noise Control System

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22124566

Keywords

active noise control; FxRLS; tracking performance; momentum technique; convergence condition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12004058]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M673128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new proportional FxRLS (PFxRLS) algorithm to solve the sensitivity and tracking performance limitations of the traditional FxRLS algorithm. The algorithm successfully reduces the sensitivity to user-defined parameters and improves robustness and denoising performance through the introduction of momentum technique.
The filtered-x recursive least square (FxRLS) algorithm is widely used in the active noise control system and has achieved great success in some complex de-noising environments, such as the cabin in vehicles and aircraft. However, its performance is sensitive to some user-defined parameters such as the forgetting factor and initial gain. Once these parameters are not selected properly, the de-noising effect of FxRLS will deteriorate. Moreover, the tracking performance of FxRLS for mutation is still restricted to a certain extent. To solve the above problems, this paper proposes a new proportional FxRLS (PFxRLS) algorithm. The forgetting factor and initial gain sensitivity are successfully reduced without introducing new turning parameters. The de-noising level and tracking performance have also been improved. Moreover, the momentum technique is introduced in PFxRLS to further improve its robustness and de-noising level. To ensure stability, its convergence condition is also discussed in this paper. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithms is illustrated by simulations and experiments with different user-defined parameters and time-varying noise environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available