4.6 Article

An Analysis of Semicircular Channel Backscattering Interferometry through Ray Tracing Simulations

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22114301

Keywords

backscattering interferometry; refractive index; semicircular channel; ray tracing; microfluidics

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/L016648/1]
  2. EPSRC/NPIF - Carbometrics [EP/R51245/X]
  3. Impact Acceleration Account - Bristol Nano Dynamics [EP/R511663/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a ray tracing model for on-chip backscattering interferometry with a semicircular cross-section. Comparing with experimental data, it is found that the current semicircular geometry cannot explain the results, indicating the need for further clarification on the optical mechanisms behind different modalities of backscattering interferometry.
Recent backscattering interferometry studies utilise a single channel microfluidic system, typically approximately semicircular in cross-section. Here, we present a complete ray tracing model for on-chip backscattering interferometry with a semicircular cross-section, including the dependence upon polarisation and angle of incidence. The full model is validated and utilised to calculate the expected fringe patterns and sensitivities observed under both normal and oblique angles of incidence. Comparison with experimental data from approximately semicircular channels using the parameters stated shows that they cannot be explained using a semicircular geometry. The disagreement does not impact on the validity of the experimental data, but highlights that the optical mechanisms behind the various modalities of backscattering interferometry would benefit from clarification. From the analysis presented here, we conclude that for reasons of ease of analysis, data quality, and sensitivity for a given radius, capillary-based backscattering interferometry affords numerous benefits over on-chip backscattering interferometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available