4.6 Article

Evaluating Different TiO2 Nanoflower-Based Composites for Humidity Detection

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22155794

Keywords

TiO2 nanoflower; solution immersion method; composite; humidity sensor

Funding

  1. Young Talent Researcher (YTR) Grant [600-RMC/YTR/5/3 (004/2021)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of different composite combinations with TiO2 nanoflowers on the performance of a humidity sensor was examined. The combination of TiO2 with rGO produced the highest sensor response. This achievement is attributed to an increase in the electrical conductivity, hydrophilicity, and specific surface area of the composite.
Unique three-dimensional (3D) titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoflowers (TFNA) have shown great potential for humidity sensing applications, due to their large surface area-to-volume ratio and high hydrophilicity. The formation of a composite with other materials could further enhance the performance of this material. In this work, the effect of different types of composites on the performance of a TNFA-based humidity sensor was examined. NiO, ZnO, rGO, and PVDF have been explored as possible composite pairing candidates with TiO2 nanoflowers, which were prepared via a modified solution immersion method. The properties of the composites were examined using field emission electron spectroscopy (FESEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), current-voltage (I-V) analysis, Hall effect measurement, and contact angle measurement. The performance of the humidity sensor was assessed using a humidity sensor measurement system inside a humidity-controlled chamber. Based on the result, the combination of TiO2 with rGO produced the highest sensor response at 39,590%. The achievement is attributed to the increase in the electrical conductivity, hydrophilicity, and specific surface area of the composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available