4.7 Article

Photodegradation of free estrogens driven by UV light: Effects of operation mode and water matrix

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 835, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155515

Keywords

Photolysis; UVC; Estrogens; NOM; Operation mode

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrogens, as endocrine disrupting chemicals, are frequently detected in water matrices and pose health risks. This study investigates the photochemical degradation of four estrogens under monochromatic irradiation. The mode of photoreactor operation and the water matrix significantly affect the photolytic behavior of estrogens.
Estrogens are endocrine disrupting chemicals that have been frequently detected in diverse water matrices (e.g. surface water, wastewater and drinking water) and caused a series of health risks. This study was aimed at investigating the photochemical degradation of free estrogens estrone (E1), 17 ss-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), and 17 alpha-ethyl estradiol (EE2) upon the monochromatic irradiation (253.7 nm). Concerning the practical installation of photolysis treatment, exposing the impacts of photoreactor operation mode (stationary or up-flow) and the water matrix (ultrapure water or natural surface water) on the photolytic behaviour of estrogens was of high importance. The pseudo-first-order rate constants showed that E1 was the most susceptible to UV radiation among chosen estrogens due to its high molar absorption coefficient of 402.4M(-1) cm(-1) and quantum yield of 0.065 mol E-1 at lambda= 253.7 nm. Moreover, the up-flow mode and the surface water matrix collected from a lake in Regent's Park (London) were found to favour the photodegradation of estrogens due to the introduction of more dissolved oxygens and promotion of reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. These findings may shed light on the photochemical behaviour of estrogens in some specific scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available