4.8 Article

Ultrastructure reveals ancestral vertebrate pharyngeal skeleton in yunnanozoans

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 377, Issue 6602, Pages 218-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abm2708

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [42288201, 41921002, 42072006]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [0206-14380137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pharyngeal arches are an important innovation in the evolution of vertebrate jaws and braincase. By analyzing the branchial arches of yunnanozoans, it was found that they share similar cellular cartilage and extracellular matrix features with vertebrates, providing further evidence that yunnanozoans are stem vertebrates.
Pharyngeal arches are a key innovation that likely contributed to the evolution of the jaws and braincase of vertebrates. It has long been hypothesized that the pharyngeal (branchial) arch evolved from an unjointed cartilaginous rod in vertebrate ancestors such as that in the nonvertebrate chordate amphioxus, but whether such ancestral anatomy existed remains unknown. The pharyngeal skeleton of controversial Cambrian animals called yunnanozoans may contain the oldest fossil evidence constraining the early evolution of the arches, yet its correlation with that of vertebrates is still disputed. By examining additional specimens in previously unexplored techniques (for example, x-ray microtomography, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and energy dispersive spectrometry element mapping), we found evidence that yunnanozoan branchial arches consist of cellular cartilage with an extracellular matrix dominated by microfibrils, a feature hitherto considered specific to vertebrates. Our phylogenetic analysis provides further support that yunnanozoans are stem vertebrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available