4.1 Article

The effect of acid use as a preservative on the results of biochemical tests measured in 24-h urine

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2022.2092899

Keywords

24-h urine; preservative; acidification; biochemical analytes; catecholamines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty-four-hour urine measurements are crucial for diagnosing, monitoring, and treating various diseases. Different collection methods can affect the results of certain tests, such as chloride, microalbumin, amylase, and protein. The measurement of adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine should be done in acid-added urine.
Twenty-four-hour urine measurements play a crucial role in the diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of various diseases. There are different approaches to the collection of urine in patients who need to collect multiple urine samples at a time, especially in hospitals with heavy workloads. In this study, we compared the sodium, potassium, chloride, amylase, calcium, creatinine, phosphorus, microalbumin, protein, magnesium, urea, uric acid, adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, metanephrine, normetanephrine, vanillylmandelic acid, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and homovanillic acid results of 24-h urine samples analyzed immediately without acid addition, which we accepted as the reference and baseline measurement, with the results of the samples analyzed after waiting for 24 h without acid addition, analyzed immediately with acid addition and analyzed after waiting for 24 h with acid addition. Chloride, microalbumin, amylase and protein tests, which are recommended to be measured in the sample without preservatives, are affected by acid addition. Adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine, which are the tests recommended to be measured in acid-added urine are degraded in the samples without acid, and the levels of metanephrine and normetanephrine were not significantly degraded in the absence of preservatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available