4.4 Article

A crescendo of competent coding (c3) contains the Standard Genetic Code

Journal

RNA
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 1337-1347

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.079275.122

Keywords

HGT; anticodon; codon; origin; triplet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Standard Genetic Code (SGC) can be formed by merging partial codes evolved in different individuals. This process can be achieved through the evolution of accurate third-position Crick wobble. The fusion of these code fragments leads to the creation of an SGC, which can be reached sooner and more frequently compared to other coding tables or nonfusing codes.
The Standard Genetic Code (SGC) can arise by fusion of partial codes evolved in different individuals, perhaps for differing prior tasks. Such code fragments can be unified into an SGC after later evolution of accurate third-position Crick wobble. Late wobble advent fills in the coding table, leaving only later development of translational initiation and termination to reach the SGC in separated domains of life. This code fusion mechanism is computationally implemented here. Late Crick wobble after C3 fusion (c3-lCw) is tested for its ability to evolve the SGC. Compared with previously studied isolated coding tables, or with increasing numbers of parallel, but nonfusing codes, c3-lCw reaches the SGC sooner, is successful in a smaller population, and presents accurate and complete codes more frequently. Notably, a long crescendo of SGC-like codes is exposed for selection of superior translation. c3-lCw also effectively suppresses varied disordered assignments, thus converging on a unified code. Such merged codes closely approach the SGC, making its selection plausible. For example: Under routine conditions, approximate to 1 of 22 c3-lCw environments evolves codes with >= 20 assignments and <= 3 differences from the SGC, notably including codes identical to the Standard Genetic Code.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available