4.6 Article

Characterization of a new NSP2-deletion NADC34-Like Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in China

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 212-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.08.001

Keywords

PRRSV; NADC34-Like strain; NSP2-deletion

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Research Project of China [2018YFD0500104, 2018YFD0500803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides valuable evidence for understanding the genomic characteristics and potential pathogenicity of the NADC34-like strain 2020-Acheng-1.
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) is the causative agent of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), which has caused huge economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. PRRSV NADC34-Like PRRSV 2020-Acheng-1 strain, which caused high morbidity and high mortality were iso-lated from dead piglets (high-throughput sequencing to show that only PRRSV and TGEV) on a farm in north-eastern China. The full-length genome sequence of 2020-Acheng-1 shares 95.6% nucleotide homology with NADC34 PRRSV without any gene insertion, but has a unique 17 amino acid (469aa to 486aa) deletion in Nsp2 compared with all NADC34-Like strains in NCBI and there are unique 100 amino acid deletions. In addition, difference degree of changes in signal peptide, trans-membrane region (TM), main neutralizing epitope (PNE), non-neutralizing epitope and N-glycosylation site were observed in GP5 of 2020-Acheng-1 and other PRRSV-2 strains, we only found a change in the fifteenth amino acid of signal peptide of in GP5 of 2020-Acheng-1 with NADC34 strains. Recombination analysis showed that 2020-Acheng-1 strain did not have any recombination events with representative PRRSV-2 strains in China. This study provided valuable evidence for understanding the role of NADC34-Like strain that impact on pathogenicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available