4.8 Article

Impacts of model structure, framework, and flexibility on perspectives of 100% renewable energy transition decision-making

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112452

Keywords

Energy transition modelling; Overnight scenarios; Nodal resolution; Investment optimisation model; Simulation model; Design flexibility; EnergyPLAN; LUT model

Funding

  1. LUT University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the discourse on 100% renewable energy systems has progressed, energy system modelling tools have been developed to demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of fully sustainable energy systems. This paper examines two such models, the LUT Energy System Transition model and the EnergyPLAN simulation tool, and analyzes various modelling approaches used by researchers. The results indicate a dominant role for solar PV in the energy system, but limitations in EnergyPLAN's sector coupling capabilities make it more costly compared to the LUT model. Additionally, the study finds that high transmission does not add much value in countries with abundant solar resources.
As the discourse surrounding 100% renewable energy systems has evolved, several energy system modelling tools have been developed to demonstrate the technical feasibility and economic viability of fully sustainable, sector coupled energy systems. While the characteristics of these tools vary among each other, their purpose remains consistent in integrating renewable energy technologies into future energy systems. This paper examines two such energy system models, the LUT Energy System Transition model, an optimisation model, and the EnergyPLAN simulation tool, a simulation model, and develops cost-optimal scenarios under identical assumptions. This paper further analyses different novel modelling approaches used by modellers. Scenarios are developed using the LUT model for Sun Belt countries, for the case of Bolivia, to examine the effects of multi and single-node structuring, and the effects of overnight and energy transition scenarios are analysed. Results for all scenarios indicate a solar PV dominated energy system; however, limitations arise in the sector coupling capabilities in EnergyPLAN, leading it to have noticeably higher annualised costs compared to the single-node scenario from the LUT model despite similar primary levelised costs of electricity. Multi-nodal results reveal that for countries with rich solar resources, high transmission from regions of best solar resources adds little value compared to fully decentralised systems. Finally, compared to the overnight scenarios, transition scenarios demonstrate the impact of considering legacy energy systems in sustainable energy system analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available