4.8 Review

Operation and maintenance for floating wind turbines: A review

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112499

Keywords

Offshore wind; Floating offshore wind; Operations and maintenance; Decision support modelling; Safety; Operational limits

Funding

  1. EPSRC through the Wind and Marine Energy Systems Centre for Doctoral Training [EP/S023801/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a review of the existing literature on the models for operations and maintenance of floating offshore wind (FOW). It categorizes the publications into cost modeling, O&M modeling, and safety/limiting factors. The case studies used in these publications show a development trend in Northern Europe. The paper discusses the key differences between floating and bottom-fixed applications and presents recommendations for future research.
This paper reviews the existing literature surrounding floating offshore wind (FOW) operations and maintenance (O&M) models. A review of the technology is presented with a comparison with current practise for bottom-fixed offshore wind O&M activities. This article divides existing publications into the following categories: cost modelling, O&M modelling, and safety/limiting factors. A review of the case studies used within these publications shows trends towards development in Northern Europe. Factors considered during cost modelling are discussed with a review of levelised cost of energy results for the three main types of floating support structure. The key O&M inputs for FOW applications are identified and then analysed detailing the key differences between floating and bottom-fixed applications. Finally, the publications detail the impact of the motion of the turbine on O&M activities are discussed. Key areas of FOW O&M research are identified with details of current research gaps and recommendations for future work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available