4.7 Article

A decision support framework for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 313-318

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.017

Keywords

Non -small cell lung cancer; Pathologic N2; Postoperative radiotherapy; Decision support framework

Funding

  1. Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [92059206]
  2. Shanghai Chest Hospital Project of Collaborative Innovation [YJXT20190101]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82103010]
  4. Shang- hai Outstanding Academic Leaders Plan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial in patients with pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Recent studies have identified potential predictors of PORT. This study developed a decision support framework (DSF) combining risk factors and prognostic index to predict the outcomes of PORT. A specific pN2 subgroup with a high risk of loco-regional recurrence and without certain histological features may benefit from PORT.
Introduction: Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) plays a highly controversial role in pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) disease. Recent studies reveal that not all patients can benefit from PORT. Further research is needed to identify predictors of PORT.Methods: A total of 1044 pathologic stage T1-3N2M0 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Risk factors of dis-tant metastasis were identified by the log-rank tests and the multivariable Cox models. We integrated risk factors of distant metastasis and our previously published loco-regional recurrence (LRR) related prognostic index into a decision support framework (DSF) to predict the outcomes of PORT. An indepen-dent cohort was used to validate the DSF.Results: We defined patients with more than two of three identified LRR-related features (heavy cigarette smoking history, clinical N2 status, and more than four positive lymph nodes) as a high LRR risk group. We found the high-intermediate-risk histological type (with micropapillary and/or solid components) was associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis (HR = 1.207, 95 % CI 1.062 to 1.371, P = 0.0038), but not LRR. We built the DSF by combining these two types of features. Patients were stratified into four groups by using the DSF. PORT significantly improved OS only in the subgroup without high-risk histological features (without micropapillary or solid components) and with a high risk for LRR (three-year OS: 66.7 % in the PORT group vs 50.2 % in the non-PORT group; P = 0.023). Conclusions: A particular pN2 subgroup with a high risk of LRR and without micropapillary or solid com-ponents could benefit from PORT.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 173 (2022) 313-318

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available