4.7 Article

Cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): a randomised controlled feasibility study in patients with distressing paranoid beliefs

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 53, Issue 10, Pages 4614-4626

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722001520

Keywords

Cognitive bias modification; interpretation bias; paranoia; psychosis; RCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the feasibility and efficacy of Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with paranoia. The results showed that CBM-pa was effective in reducing interpretation bias, improving paranoia symptoms, and reducing levels of depressed and anxious mood. The study provides a foundation for conducting a fully powered randomized controlled trial.
Background Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) is a novel, theory-driven psychological intervention targeting the biased interpretation of emotional ambiguity associated with paranoia. Study objectives were (i) test the intervention's feasibility, (ii) provide effect size estimates, (iii) assess dose-response and (iv) select primary outcomes for future trials. Methods In a double-blind randomised controlled trial, sixty-three outpatients with clinically significant paranoia were randomised to either CBM-pa or an active control (text reading) between April 2016 and September 2017. Patients received one 40 min session per week for 6 weeks. Assessments were given at baseline, after each interim session, post-treatment, and at 1- and 3-months post-treatment. Results A total of 122 patients were screened and 63 were randomised. The recruitment rate was 51.2%, with few dropouts (four out of 63) and follow-up rates were 90.5% (1-month) and 93.7% (3-months). Each session took 30-40 min to complete. There was no statistical evidence of harmful effects of the intervention. Preliminary data were consistent with efficacy of CBM-pa over text-reading control: patients randomised to the intervention, compared to control patients, reported reduced interpretation bias (d = -0.48 to -0.76), improved symptoms of paranoia (d = -0.19 to -0.38), and lower depressed and anxious mood (d = -0.03 to -0.29). The intervention effect was evident after the third session. Conclusions CBM-pa is feasible for patients with paranoia. A fully powered randomised control trial is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available