4.7 Article

Improving the prospective prediction of a near-term suicide attempt in veterans at risk for suicide, using a go/no-go task

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 53, Issue 9, Pages 4245-4254

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722001003

Keywords

Suicide prediction; impulsivity; response inhibition; Go; No-go; computational model; linear ballistic accumulator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined whether performance on a Go/No-go (GNG) task and computational modeling could enhance prediction of suicide attempts within the next 90 days among individuals at high-risk for suicide. The results showed that increased miss rate on the GNG task predicted actual suicide attempts, while increased false alarm rate predicted other suicide-related events. Computational modeling revealed that decreases in decisional efficiency to targets were specifically associated with upcoming suicide attempts. These findings suggest that GNG testing may improve prediction of near-term suicide risk.
Background Neurocognitive testing may advance the goal of predicting near-term suicide risk. The current study examined whether performance on a Go/No-go (GNG) task, and computational modeling to extract latent cognitive variables, could enhance prediction of suicide attempts within next 90 days, among individuals at high-risk for suicide. Method 136 Veterans at high-risk for suicide previously completed a computer-based GNG task requiring rapid responding (Go) to target stimuli, while withholding responses (No-go) to infrequent foil stimuli; behavioral variables included false alarms to foils (failure to inhibit) and missed responses to targets. We conducted a secondary analysis of these data, with outcomes defined as actual suicide attempt (ASA), other suicide-related event (OtherSE) such as interrupted/aborted attempt or preparatory behavior, or neither (noSE), within 90-days after GNG testing, to examine whether GNG variables could improve ASA prediction over standard clinical variables. A computational model (linear ballistic accumulator, LBA) was also applied, to elucidate cognitive mechanisms underlying group differences. Results On GNG, increased miss rate selectively predicted ASA, while increased false alarm rate predicted OtherSE (without ASA) within the 90-day follow-up window. In LBA modeling, ASA (but not OtherSE) was associated with decreases in decisional efficiency to targets, suggesting differences in the evidence accumulation process were specifically associated with upcoming ASA. Conclusions These findings suggest that GNG may improve prediction of near-term suicide risk, with distinct behavioral patterns in those who will attempt suicide within the next 90 days. Computational modeling suggests qualitative differences in cognition in individuals at near-term risk of suicide attempt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available