4.7 Review

Insects allocate eggs adaptively according to plant age, stress, disease or damage

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0831

Keywords

host plant; oviposition; preference-performance; quality; survival; vigour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most herbivorous insects have evolved sophisticated sensory recognition systems to find and lay eggs on plants that support offspring development. This study reviewed 71 studies on 62 insect species, and found that insects exhibit adaptive maternal behavior by selecting plants that are best for offspring development, regardless of the plant's age, stress, disease, or damage.
Most herbivorous insects can only survive on a small subset of the plant species in its environment. Consequently, adult females have evolved sophisticated sensory recognition systems enabling them to find and lay eggs on plants supporting offspring development. This leads to the preference-performance or 'mother knows best' hypothesis that insects should be attracted to host plants that confer higher offspring survival. Previous work shows insects generally select plant species that are best for larval survival, although this is less likely for crops or exotic host plants. Even within a species, however, individual plants can vary greatly in potential suitability depending on age, access to water or nutrients or attack by pathogens or other herbivores. Here, I systematically review 71 studies on 62 insect species testing the preference-performance hypothesis with sets of plants varying in age, stress, fungal/microbial infection or herbivore damage. Altogether, 77% of insects tested with a native host (N = 43) allocated their eggs to plants best for offspring development, as did 64% (N = 22) of insects tested with an exotic host. Results were similar across plant age, stress, disease and damage categories. These findings show adaptive maternal behaviour in insects occurs for both host species and variation among individual plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available