4.6 Article

IL-2, IL-6 and chitinase 3-like 2 might predict early relapse activity in multiple sclerosis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270607

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Charles University Grant Agency (GA UK) [470119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By assessing the biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum obtained early after the onset of multiple sclerosis, this study found that the IL-2:IL-6 ratio, IL-2, and chitinase 3-like 2 may serve as prognostic biomarkers in the early stages of the disease.
Background The possibility to better predict the severity of the disease in a patient newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis would allow the treatment strategy to be personalized and lead to better clinical outcomes. Prognostic biomarkers are highly needed. Objective To assess the prognostic value of intrathecal IgM synthesis, cerebrospinal fluid and serum IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, chitinase 3-like 2 and neurofilament heavy chains obtained early after the onset of the disease. Methods 58 patients after the first manifestation of multiple sclerosis were included. After the initial diagnostic assessment including serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, all patients initiated therapy with either glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or interferon beta. To assess the evolution of the disease, we followed the patients clinically and with MRI for two years. Results The IL-2:IL-6 ratio (both in cerebrospinal fluid) <0.48 (p = 0.0028), IL-2 in cerebrospinal fluid >= 1.23pg/ml(p = 0.026), and chitinase 3-like 2 in cerebrospinal fluid >= 7900pg/ml(p = 0.033), as well as baseline EDSS >= 1.5 (p = 0.0481) and age <22 (p = 0.0312), proved to be independent markers associated with shorter relapse free intervals. Conclusion The IL-2:IL-6 ratio, IL-2, and chitinase 3-like 2 (all in cerebrospinal fluid) might be of value as prognostic biomarkers in early phases of multiple sclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available