4.6 Article

Using text data instead of SIC codes to tag innovative firms and classify industrial activities

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270041

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Interprofessional fund for continuous training of managers promoted by Confindustria and Federmanager [CIG 8188368708]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper uses text mining and semantic algorithms to tag innovative firms and offers a different perspective to classify industrial activities. By gathering information from companies' websites and extracting keywords, the paper provides a more in-depth and updated understanding of firms' activities. By matching firms' keywords, the degree of closeness between the observed firms can be explored, providing a measurement of industrial proximity. The analysis presented in this paper can offer policymakers a detailed and comprehensive picture of the innovative trajectories shaping the industrial structure in a specific geographic area.
The paper uses text mining and semantic algorithms to tag innovative firms and offer an alternative perspective to classify industrial activities. Instead of referring to firms' standard industrial classification codes, we gather information from companies' websites and corporate purposes, extract keywords and generate tags concerning firms' activities, specializations, and competences. Evidence is interesting because allows us to understand 'what firms do' in a more penetrating and updated way than referring to standard industrial classification codes. Moreover, through matching firms' keywords, we can explore the degree of closeness between the firms under observation, a measure by which researchers can derive industrial proximity. The analysis can provide policymakers with a detailed and comprehensive picture of the innovative trajectories underlying the industrial structure in a geographic area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available