4.5 Article

Monitoring residual kidney function in haemodialysis patients using timed urine collections: validation of the use of estimated blood results to calculate GFR

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac80e8

Keywords

residual kidney function; hemodialysis; kinetic modelling

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health, Research Health Technology Assessment Programme [14/216/01]
  2. National Institute for Health Research [ICA-CL-2017-03-017]
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [ICA-CL-2017-03-017] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ICA-CL-2017-03-017] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to validate the steady state assumption in estimating residual clearance in hemodialysis patients. The results showed that using estimated plasma levels to calculate GFR yielded consistent results with measured levels, with only a small percentage of patients showing clinically significant differences in GFR calculations. Overall, the steady state assumption was found to be effective in estimating solute levels for GFR calculations in hemodialysis patients.
Objective. With growing recognition of the benefits of preserving residual kidney function (RKF) and use of incremental treatment regimes, the incentive to measure residual clearance in haemodialysis patients is increasing. Interdialytic urine collections used to monitor RKF in research studies are considered impractical in routine care, partly due to the requirement for blood samples before and after the collection. Plasma solute levels can be estimated if patients are in 'steady state', where urea and creatinine concentrations increase at a constant rate between dialysis sessions and are reduced by a constant ratio at each session. Validation of the steady state assumption would allow development of simplified protocols for urine collections in HD patients. Approach. Equations were derived for estimating plasma urea and creatinine at the start or end of the interdialytic interval for patients in steady state. Data collected during the BISTRO study was used to assess the agreement between measured and estimated plasma levels and the effect of using estimated levels on the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Main results. The mean difference between GFR calculated with estimated plasma levels for the HD session after the collection and a full set of measured levels was 2.0% (95% limits of agreement -10.7% to +14.7%, N = 316). Where plasma levels for the session before the collection were estimated, the mean difference was 1.2% (limits of agreement -10.3% to +7.9%, N = 275). Significance. Using estimated levels for one session led to a clinically significant difference in the calculated GFR for less than 3% of the collections studied. This indicates that the steady state assumption can be used to estimate solute levels when determining GFR from timed urine collections. A pragmatic approach to monitoring RKF in HD would be for patients to collect for approximately 24 h before routine bloods are taken.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available