4.7 Article

Lattice Boltzmann model for simulation of flow in intracranial aneurysms considering non-Newtonian effects

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0098383

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [422037413, TRR 287]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201908080236]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a robust modified lattice Boltzmann model with independent control over relaxation of acoustic modes is proposed for studying blood flow in intracranial aneurysms. The use of a robust collision operator and implicit computation of non-linear stress allows for a wide range of operation in terms of time step and grid size. The model is validated through well-documented configurations and used to simulate pulsating flow in different viscosity conditions and patient-specific configurations.
We propose a robust modified central Hermite polynomial-based multiple relaxation time lattice Boltzmann model with independent control over relaxation of acoustic modes for non-Newtonian fluids, more specifically in the context of blood flow in intracranial aneurysms. The use of the robust collision operator along with the implicit computation of the non-linear stress allows for a very wide operation domain in terms of time step and grid-size. The solver is first validated via well-documented configurations such as the 2D Poiseuille-Hagen and lid-driven cavity flows with a power-law fluid. The results clearly show second-order convergence of the scheme. The model is then used to simulate pulsating flow in an ideal aneurysm geometry with four different viscosity laws, namely, Newtonian, power-law, Carreau-Yasuda, and Cross. The results show that the assumption of high shear rates does not necessarily hold within the aneurysm sac. Finally, the solver is used to simulate pulsating blood flow in a patient-specific configuration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available