4.7 Article

Some new insights for inferring diapycnal (irreversible) diffusivity in stably stratified turbulence

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0102762

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-2149047]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-22-1-2043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new insight into inferring diapycnal diffusivity in stably stratified turbulent flows is obtained based on physical scaling arguments and high-resolution direct numerical simulation data. The study shows that the diapycnal diffusivity can be decomposed into a diapycnal length scale and a diapycnal velocity scale, which can be related to the measurable Ellison length scale and vertical turbulent velocity scale through a turbulent Froude number scaling analysis.
New insight for inferring diapycnal diffusivity in stably stratified turbulent flows is obtained based on physical scaling arguments and tested using high-resolution direct numerical simulation data. It is shown that the irreversible diapycnal diffusivity can be decomposed into a diapycnal length scale that represents an inner scale of turbulence and a diapycnal velocity scale. Furthermore, it is shown that the diapycnal length scale and velocity scale can be related to the measurable Ellison length scale (L-E) that represents outer scale of turbulence and vertical turbulent velocity scale (w ') through a turbulent Froude number scaling analysis. The turbulent Froude number is defined as Fr=epsilon/Nk, where epsilon is the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy, N is the buoyancy frequency, and k is the turbulent kinetic energy. The scaling analysis suggests that the diapycnal diffusivity K-rho similar to w ' L(E )in the weakly stratified regime (Fr > 1) and K-rho similar to(w ' L-E)xFr for the strongly stratified regime (Fr < 1). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available