4.3 Article

Persistent current effects in highly homogeneous superconducting magnets

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2022.1354094

Keywords

Persistent current; Superconducting magnet; Homogeneity; Spherical harmonics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12105042]
  2. Foundation of Engineering Research Center of Nuclear Technology Application (East China University of Technology) , Ministry of Education [HJSJYB2018-6]
  3. Key R & D Program of Jiangxi province [20192ACB80006]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201304910241]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the critical state model, this study simulates the magnetization curve of a single superconducting wire and the variation of higher-order magnetic field components with current for a 7 T highly homogeneous magnet. The results are validated through magnetization curve measurement and cool-down test on the superconducting magnet, demonstrating the effectiveness of this methodology.
Many factors affect the magnetic field quality of superconducting magnet, among which the persistent current originating from the inherent attribute of superconducting material exists for a long time and has a greater influence on the magnetic field quality, and its influence on the magnetic field of highly homogeneous magnets has not been reported yet. Based on the critical state model, the magnetization curve of a single superconducting wire, as well as the variation of the higher-order magnetic field components with current of a typical pre-cycle are simulated for a 7 T highly homogeneous magnet. For the validation, the magnetization curves of a single superconducting wire are measured, and the superconducting magnet is subjected to a cool-down test. Compared to zonal harmonics, more obvious hysteresis phenomena for tesseral harmonic components are observed and validated, which confirmed the effectiveness of this methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available