Journal
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
Volume 597, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127254
Keywords
Climate network; Complex system; Multiple testing correction; Family-wise error rate; False discovery rate
Categories
Funding
- Italian Ministry of University and Research (Ministero della Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica) through the PRIN2017 project RELAID
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the application of multiple testing corrections in complex network analysis. By comparing four different methods, it is found that false discovery rate correction is a better option.
Multiple testing corrections (MTC) are used to reduce type I error in a group of two or more tests, or when two or more tests address a common null hypothesis. The MTC methods available can be divided into two different families according to the control of type I error: (i) the family-wise error rate; (ii) the false discovery. Four MTC methods are investigated here, highlighting advantages and disadvantages in complex networks. We use a binarized precipitation network as illustrative case study. False discovery rate corrections seem to be a better option in complex network analyses. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available