4.2 Article

The influence of polymorphisms in TNIK gene on risperidone response in a Chinese Han population

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 575-583

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0052

Keywords

antipsychotics; pharmacogenetics; risperidone response; schizophrenia; TNIK

Funding

  1. Foundation of Brain Science and Brain-Like Intelligence Technology [2021ZD0201904]
  2. Foundation of CRC Shanghai Mental Health Center [CRC2021ZD02]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1307005]
  4. Foundation of Shanghai Mental Health Center Sailing Plan [2018-QH-05]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971257]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [17ZR1424600, 20ZR1448400]
  7. Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [16XJ21010]
  8. Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Mental Health [19MC1911100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revealed an association between the rs2088885 and rs7627954 SNPs of the TNIK gene and risperidone treatment response.
Aim: To investigate whether the TNIK gene affects risperidone treatment outcomes in the Chinese population. Methods: A total of 148 unrelated inpatients who received risperidone for six weeks were enrolled. The selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs2088885, rs7627954 and rs13065441) were genotyped using the MassARRAY (R) SNP IPLEX platform. Results: The analysis showed that one novel SNP of TNIK, rs7627954, had a significant association with the response to risperidone (chi(2) = 4.472; p = 0.034). This work also identified rs2088885 as significantly associated with risperidone response (chi(2) = 5.257; p = 0.022). The result revealed that the rs2088885-rs7627954 C-T haplotype was more prevalent in good responders than in poor responders (p = 0.0278). Conclusion: This study revealed that the rs2088885 and rs7627954 SNPs of TNIK are associated with risperidone treatment response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available