4.2 Review

Precision medicine in interventional cardiology: implications for antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages 723-737

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0057

Keywords

antiplatelet therapy; genetic tests; percutaneous coronary intervention; platelet function testing; precision medicine

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Bayer
  4. Biosensors
  5. CeloNova
  6. CSL Behring
  7. Daiichi-Sankyo
  8. Eisai
  9. Eli Lilly
  10. Gilead
  11. Janssen
  12. Matsutani Chemical Industry Co.
  13. Merck
  14. Novartis
  15. Osprey Medical
  16. Renal Guard Solutions
  17. Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation
  18. Spanish Society of Cardiology [SEC/MHE-MOV-INT 20/001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precision medicine proposes customized treatments for individual patients instead of a one-size-fits-all model. While widely adopted in cancer medicine, implementing precision medicine in cardiovascular medicine is more challenging. Personalized antiplatelet therapy is crucial for cardiovascular patients, but it is associated with bleeding risks. This review discusses the rationale, evidence, and future directions in personalizing antiplatelet treatment for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Precision medicine is a medical model that proposes the customization of medical treatments to the individual patient, as opposed to a one-drug-fits-all model. Such a personalized medicine approach has been widely adopted in several medical fields, such as cancer medicine, but the implementation of precision medicine in cardiovascular medicine has not been similarly straightforward. Because pharmacogenomics plays an important role in the safety and efficacy of cardiovascular drug therapy, there has been a great interest in the use of tools aiming at personalizing antiplatelet therapy. Moreover, antiplatelet therapy is essential for the treatment of cardiovascular patients to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications, particularly those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but it is inevitably associated with increased bleeding risk. In this review, the authors discuss the rationale, summarize the evidence and discuss the current and future directions for the personalization of antiplatelet treatment regimens in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available